OutSystems vs Adalo

OutSystems and Adalo are both popular low-code development platforms, but they cater to different user bases and application needs. OutSystems focuses on enterprise-grade applications with robust features for scalability and integration, while Adalo is designed for users looking to create mobile and web applications quickly and with minimal technical knowledge. This comparison will cover their target audiences, ease of use, design capabilities, backend management, performance, integrations, and pricing.

Speak to an expert

1. Target Audience and Use Cases

OutSystems:

  • Enterprises and Large Organizations: Tailored for large companies looking to develop complex applications.
  • Enterprise Applications: Ideal for building business-critical applications, internal tools, and customer-facing solutions.

Adalo:

  • Small Businesses and Startups: Targeted towards entrepreneurs and small teams who want to build apps without deep technical expertise.
  • Mobile and Web Apps: Suitable for creating simple to moderately complex mobile and web applications.

Verdict: OutSystems is better for enterprises needing robust solutions, while Adalo is ideal for small businesses and individuals looking for quick app development.

2. Ease of Use

OutSystems:

  • Visual Development: Offers a drag-and-drop interface, but can be complex due to its extensive features.
  • Learning Curve: May require more training for users to leverage its full capabilities, particularly for advanced functionalities.

Adalo:

  • User-Friendly Interface: Features an intuitive drag-and-drop builder that makes it easy for anyone to create apps.
  • Quick Learning Curve: Suitable for beginners, allowing users to build functional apps quickly without prior coding knowledge.

Verdict: Adalo is generally easier to use for beginners, while OutSystems may require more training for effective use.

3. Design and Customization

OutSystems:

  • Comprehensive Design Tools: Offers a range of UI components and customization options for building enterprise applications.
  • Responsive Design: Capable of creating responsive apps for various devices, but may require more technical knowledge to customize fully.

Adalo:

  • Pre-Built Components: Provides a library of pre-designed components for quick assembly of applications.
  • Flexibility: Allows users to create visually appealing apps with relative ease, although customization is somewhat limited compared to OutSystems.

Verdict: OutSystems offers more robust design capabilities suited for complex applications, while Adalo excels in rapid design for simpler apps.

4. Backend and Database Management

OutSystems:

  • Powerful Backend Features: Includes built-in support for databases, user authentication, and complex business logic.
  • Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with existing enterprise systems and third-party services, making it suitable for complex workflows.

Adalo:

  • Basic Database Functionality: Provides basic database capabilities and user authentication, ideal for simpler applications.
  • Limited Backend Logic: Not as robust as OutSystems for complex business logic and integrations.

Verdict: OutSystems is superior in backend management, making it better suited for applications requiring significant data handling and complex business logic.

5. Performance and Scalability

OutSystems:

  • Enterprise-Level Performance: Built to handle high loads and complex applications, suitable for large-scale deployments.
  • Scalability: Designed for scalability, making it a strong choice for organizations with growing application needs.

Adalo:

  • Good for Small to Medium Apps: Performs well for small to medium-sized applications but may struggle with very high loads.
  • Limited Scalability: Not designed for enterprise-level scalability.

Verdict: OutSystems is more suitable for scalable, enterprise-grade applications, while Adalo is better for smaller-scale projects.

6. Integrations and Extensibility

OutSystems:

  • Extensive Integration Options: Offers a wide range of integrations with third-party services and APIs, essential for enterprise applications.
  • Custom Code Support: Allows developers to add custom code for enhanced functionality.

Adalo:

  • Basic Integrations: Provides integrations with common services, but its options are more limited compared to OutSystems.
  • Custom API Integration: Users can integrate custom APIs, but this may require technical knowledge.

Verdict: OutSystems offers more extensive integration capabilities, making it suitable for complex applications, while Adalo has basic integrations that work for simpler apps.

7. Pricing

OutSystems:

  • Higher Pricing: Generally more expensive, with pricing based on the number of applications, users, and cloud resources.
  • Enterprise Licensing: Costs can be significant for large teams or enterprise-level deployments.

Adalo:

  • Affordable Plans: Offers a free plan with limited features, with paid plans starting at around $50/month.
  • Transparent Pricing: Easier for small businesses to budget for app development.

Verdict: Adalo is more accessible and affordable for small projects, while OutSystems requires a larger investment for enterprise capabilities.

Final Verdict

  • Choose OutSystems if you are an enterprise or large organization needing to build complex, scalable applications with extensive backend capabilities and integrations.
  • Choose Adalo if you are a small business or individual looking for a user-friendly platform to quickly create simple mobile or web applications without extensive technical knowledge.

In summary, OutSystems is ideal for enterprises focusing on robust, scalable application development, while Adalo is perfect for small businesses and startups seeking an easy way to develop applications quickly and affordably. Your choice should depend on your specific needs and the complexity of the applications you wish to create.

Pushing No-Code to Its Limits

Launching an app has never been more cost-effective and time-efficient. Platforms like Bubble.io and Flutter Flow have transformed the development landscape, enabling developers to create sophisticated applications rapidly.

Fast and Cost-Effective Launch

No-code platforms empower startups to launch their apps at lightning speed—often multiple times faster than traditional development—at a fraction of the cost. This agile approach helps startups focus on growth and innovation rather than high upfront development expenses.

Agile Iteration

For early-stage startups, quickly reaching a problem-solution fit is critical. No-code platforms allow rapid adaptation, letting you implement and push new features live in a matter of hours, not weeks. This flexibility means you can stay responsive to market needs and iterate on your product with ease.

Seamless Integration and Plugins

Platforms like Bubble.io and Flutter Flow come with built-in integrations and a wealth of plugins, giving you instant access to essential features and functionalities. Whether you're building a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) or scaling up, these platforms make it easy to connect with tools you need, from payments to analytics.

Version Control Made Simple

Launching new versions of your app has never been easier. No-code platforms provide flexible version control, enabling you to create save points, roll back to previous versions if needed, and experiment confidently

Mayfly Ventures: Leading the No-Code Frontier

While no-code development can have limitations in performance and certain functionalities, Mayfly Ventures, led by CTO Geo George, is pushing past these boundaries. We specialise in building high-performance, highly scalable MVPs with advanced features, deep integrations, and native user experiences that feel polished and professional.

Geo has been at the forefront of low-code development, becoming one of the earliest adopters of Bubble.io in Australia. Over the past six years, he’s honed his expertise in low-code and no-code capabilities, training the Mayfly team to push these platforms to their full potential.

Book a free Growth Strategy Call

Geo

Startup mentor, product strategist, no-code wiz and PMF expert. Eclectic dance style.

Founding Partner

MUCUDU: deep integrations and AI wrapped in low code

Mayfly collaborated with the MUCUDU team to build a low-code MVP for their hospitality tech platform, which includes loyalty management, peer-to-peer monetary gifting, and Tab functionality. Beyond the standard integrations with Stripe, Apple, and Google for login and payments, we incorporated advanced integrations with Point of Sale systems like Doshii and AI-driven recommendations that personalize the dining experience.

With Mayfly Ventures, you get the speed and cost benefits of no-code, combined with the performance and functionality typically reserved for full-stack development.

VOLI Case Study: No-Code in Action

Before working with Mayfly, VOLI’s founder Charlie Crozier had approached 12 different development agencies. As a non-technical founder, Charlie struggled to get his app built and ready for users, with quotes ranging from $300,000 to $1 million. These high costs placed immense pressure on early capital raising.

“When we met Mayfly, both our budget and timeline were completely reevaluated. We were able to go to market at a fraction of the cost and time we had expected—without compromising on quality.”

—  Charlie Crozier, Founder

The Process:

Mayfly worked closely with VOLI through a series of workshops to deeply understand the product, its vision, and user needs. Leveraging no-code and low-code frameworks, we built an enterprise-grade app at a fraction of the cost quoted by other studios. Now in pilot testing, VOLI is preparing for release to 10 companies already on the waitlist.

Explore More Case Studies

Are you tackling a problem worth solving?

Let's chat opportunity!

Book a free Growth Strategy Call

No-Code Tools We Love

We use state of the art low code tools and push them to the limit to create performant, scalable, highly functional mobile web apps.

Bubble.io

A powerful no-code platform that lets you build fully functional web applications with drag-and-drop ease. Its flexibility allows you to design, develop, and launch complex apps quickly, without writing a single line of code.

Flutterflow

A platform designed for building mobile apps using Google’s Flutter framework, Flutterflow simplifies the development process while offering extensive customization, making it a go-to tool for responsive, high-performance mobile applications.

Xano

A no-code backend platform that gives you the tools to manage your database, set up APIs, and create scalable back-end solutions, all without the need for server-side programming knowledge.

Learn More About No-Code

Are you tackling a problem worth solving?

Let's chat opportunity!

Get in Touch

The No-Code Revolution

Explore how no-code platforms are transforming the way startups build and scale their products.

How Basic Should My MVP Be?

A guide to finding the right balance between features and simplicity in your MVP.