OutSystems vs Airtable

OutSystems and Airtable serve different purposes within the low-code/no-code ecosystem. OutSystems is a powerful low-code platform designed for building complex enterprise applications, while Airtable is primarily a flexible database tool that combines spreadsheet and database functionalities, making it ideal for project management and collaboration. This comparison will explore their target audiences, ease of use, design capabilities, backend management, performance, integrations, and pricing.

Speak to an expert

1. Target Audience and Use Cases

OutSystems:

  • Enterprise-Level Applications: Primarily aimed at large organizations needing to develop sophisticated applications.
  • Business-Critical Solutions: Suitable for internal tools, customer-facing applications, and systems requiring extensive business logic.

Airtable:

  • Teams and Small Businesses: Targeted at project managers, marketers, and small to medium-sized businesses looking for a flexible way to manage projects and data.
  • Collaboration and Organization: Ideal for managing projects, tracking tasks, and organizing data in a visually appealing manner.

Verdict: OutSystems is better for enterprises needing complex applications, while Airtable is ideal for teams looking for project management and database solutions.

2. Ease of Use

OutSystems:

  • Visual Development Interface: Offers a drag-and-drop builder but may have a steeper learning curve due to its extensive features.
  • Training Required: Users may need training to effectively leverage its capabilities.

Airtable:

  • User-Friendly Interface: Features a straightforward, spreadsheet-like interface that is easy to navigate.
  • Quick Adoption: Users can quickly learn how to create bases, tables, and views without prior technical knowledge.

Verdict: Airtable is more user-friendly and easier to learn, making it suitable for non-technical users.

3. Design and Customization

OutSystems:

  • Comprehensive Design Tools: Provides a range of UI components and customization options suitable for building complex applications.
  • Responsive Design: Allows for the creation of responsive applications, but extensive customization may require technical skills.

Airtable:

  • Flexible Views: Offers different views (grid, calendar, Kanban, gallery) for visualizing data, but design capabilities are limited compared to OutSystems.
  • Templates: Includes a variety of templates to get started quickly, but customization options are more constrained.

Verdict: OutSystems offers more robust design capabilities for complex applications, while Airtable is focused on organizing and visualizing data.

4. Backend and Database Management

OutSystems:

  • Powerful Backend Features: Includes built-in support for complex databases, user authentication, and business logic.
  • Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with enterprise systems and third-party services, allowing for complex workflows.

Airtable:

  • Database Functionality: Functions as a relational database, allowing users to create tables, link records, and store various data types.
  • Basic Backend Logic: Lacks the advanced backend capabilities found in OutSystems, making it less suitable for complex applications.

Verdict: OutSystems excels in backend management, making it more suitable for applications requiring significant data handling and complexity.

5. Performance and Scalability

OutSystems:

  • High Performance: Designed to handle high loads and complex applications, making it suitable for enterprise-level deployments.
  • Scalability: Built to scale with the growing needs of an organization, capable of supporting large user bases and complex applications.

Airtable:

  • Good for Small to Medium Applications: Performs well for small to medium-sized databases and projects but may struggle with large datasets and high-volume applications.
  • Limited Scalability: Not designed for enterprise-level scalability.

Verdict: OutSystems is more suitable for scalable, enterprise-grade applications, while Airtable is better for smaller projects.

6. Integrations and Extensibility

OutSystems:

  • Extensive Integration Options: Offers a wide range of integrations with third-party services and APIs, crucial for enterprise applications.
  • Custom Code Support: Allows developers to add custom code for enhanced functionality.

Airtable:

  • Basic Integrations: Provides integrations with common services, but options are more limited compared to OutSystems.
  • Automation Features: Includes built-in automation and integration capabilities through tools like Zapier.

Verdict: OutSystems offers more extensive integration capabilities, while Airtable has basic integrations that work well for simpler projects.

7. Pricing

OutSystems:

  • Higher Pricing: Generally more expensive, with pricing based on the number of applications, users, and cloud resources.
  • Enterprise Licensing: Costs can be significant for large teams or enterprise-level deployments.

Airtable:

  • Affordable Plans: Offers a free plan with limited features, with paid plans starting at around $12 per user per month.
  • Cost-Effective for Teams: Easier for small businesses to budget for project management and data organization.

Verdict: Airtable is more accessible and affordable for small projects, while OutSystems requires a larger investment for enterprise capabilities.

Final Verdict

  • Choose OutSystems if you are an enterprise or large organization needing to build complex, scalable applications with extensive backend capabilities and integrations.
  • Choose Airtable if you are a team or small business looking for an easy-to-use tool to manage projects, collaborate, and organize data efficiently.

In summary, OutSystems is ideal for enterprises focusing on robust, scalable application development, while Airtable is perfect for teams seeking a flexible and user-friendly solution for project management and data organization. Your choice should depend on your specific needs and the complexity of the applications or projects you wish to manage.

Pushing No-Code to Its Limits

Launching an app has never been more cost-effective and time-efficient. Platforms like Bubble.io and Flutter Flow have transformed the development landscape, enabling developers to create sophisticated applications rapidly.

Fast and Cost-Effective Launch

No-code platforms empower startups to launch their apps at lightning speed—often multiple times faster than traditional development—at a fraction of the cost. This agile approach helps startups focus on growth and innovation rather than high upfront development expenses.

Agile Iteration

For early-stage startups, quickly reaching a problem-solution fit is critical. No-code platforms allow rapid adaptation, letting you implement and push new features live in a matter of hours, not weeks. This flexibility means you can stay responsive to market needs and iterate on your product with ease.

Seamless Integration and Plugins

Platforms like Bubble.io and Flutter Flow come with built-in integrations and a wealth of plugins, giving you instant access to essential features and functionalities. Whether you're building a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) or scaling up, these platforms make it easy to connect with tools you need, from payments to analytics.

Version Control Made Simple

Launching new versions of your app has never been easier. No-code platforms provide flexible version control, enabling you to create save points, roll back to previous versions if needed, and experiment confidently

Geo George: Leading the No-Code Frontier

While no-code development can have limitations in performance and certain functionalities, Mayfly Ventures, led by CTO Geo George, is pushing past these boundaries. We specialise in building high-performance, highly scalable MVPs with advanced features, deep integrations, and native user experiences that feel polished and professional.

Geo has been at the forefront of low-code development, becoming one of the earliest adopters of Bubble.io in Australia. Over the past six years, he’s honed his expertise in low-code and no-code capabilities, training the Mayfly team to push these platforms to their full potential.

Book a free Growth Strategy Call

Geo

Startup mentor, product strategist, no-code wiz and PMF expert. Eclectic dance style.

Founding Partner

MUCUDU: deep integrations and AI wrapped in low code

Mayfly collaborated with the MUCUDU team to build a low-code MVP for their hospitality tech platform, which includes loyalty management, peer-to-peer monetary gifting, and Tab functionality. Beyond the standard integrations with Stripe, Apple, and Google for login and payments, we incorporated advanced integrations with Point of Sale systems like Doshii and AI-driven recommendations that personalize the dining experience.

With Mayfly Ventures, you get the speed and cost benefits of no-code, combined with the performance and functionality typically reserved for full-stack development.

VOLI Case Study: No-Code in Action

Before working with Mayfly, VOLI’s founder Charlie Crozier had approached 12 different development agencies. As a non-technical founder, Charlie struggled to get his app built and ready for users, with quotes ranging from $300,000 to $1 million. These high costs placed immense pressure on early capital raising.

“When we met Mayfly, both our budget and timeline were completely reevaluated. We were able to go to market at a fraction of the cost and time we had expected—without compromising on quality.”

—  Charlie Crozier, Founder

The Process:

Mayfly worked closely with VOLI through a series of workshops to deeply understand the product, its vision, and user needs. Leveraging no-code and low-code frameworks, we built an enterprise-grade app at a fraction of the cost quoted by other studios. Now in pilot testing, VOLI is preparing for release to 10 companies already on the waitlist.

Explore More Case Studies

Are you tackling a problem worth solving?

Let's chat opportunity!

Book a free Growth Strategy Call

No-Code Tools We Love

We use state of the art low code tools and push them to the limit to create performant, scalable, highly functional mobile web apps.

Bubble.io

A powerful no-code platform that lets you build fully functional web applications with drag-and-drop ease. Its flexibility allows you to design, develop, and launch complex apps quickly, without writing a single line of code.

Flutterflow

A platform designed for building mobile apps using Google’s Flutter framework, Flutterflow simplifies the development process while offering extensive customization, making it a go-to tool for responsive, high-performance mobile applications.

Xano

A no-code backend platform that gives you the tools to manage your database, set up APIs, and create scalable back-end solutions, all without the need for server-side programming knowledge.

Learn More About No-Code

Would you like a free product strategy call?

Let's chat opportunity!

Get in Touch

Get the Mayfly Way Template

Validate your idea, find your market, design feature sets and define your tech stack all with this free easy to use notion template.

Read our Blog

We talk about #no code #MVPs #product strategy #product market fit #fuck ups #founder stories