Thunkable vs Mendix
Thunkable and Mendix are both no-code/low-code platforms that empower users to build applications without extensive programming knowledge. However, they serve different audiences and have unique strengths tailored to specific use cases. Here’s a comprehensive comparison to help you understand their features, capabilities, and ideal applications.
.png)
1. Target Audience and Use Cases
Thunkable:
- Individual Developers and Educators: Primarily aimed at hobbyists, students, and educators looking to create mobile applications easily.
- Simple to Moderate Apps: Well-suited for building basic mobile apps, prototypes, and educational projects.
Mendix:
- Enterprise Solutions: Targeted at larger organizations needing to develop complex, enterprise-level applications.
- Business Process Management: Ideal for companies focusing on digital transformation and automating business processes through custom applications.
Verdict: Thunkable is more suited for individuals and educational purposes, while Mendix is better for enterprises and larger teams.
2. Ease of Use
Thunkable:
- User-Friendly Interface: Features a drag-and-drop interface that is intuitive and easy for beginners to navigate.
- Quick Prototyping: Allows users to rapidly prototype and test mobile applications.
Mendix:
- Visual Development Environment: Offers a more complex development environment with advanced features that may require a steeper learning curve.
- Collaboration Tools: Designed for team collaboration, making it suitable for larger organizations with multiple stakeholders.
Verdict: Thunkable is simpler and more accessible for beginners, while Mendix provides powerful collaboration features for enterprise teams.
3. Design and Customization
Thunkable:
- Basic UI Components: Offers a selection of customizable UI components, primarily focused on mobile app design.
- Responsive Design: Supports responsive design, allowing apps to function on various screen sizes.
Mendix:
- Advanced UI Design Options: Provides extensive customization capabilities, allowing for highly tailored and visually appealing applications.
- Theme and Branding: Offers robust theming options to ensure applications align with corporate branding.
Verdict: Mendix excels in design flexibility and customization, particularly for complex applications, while Thunkable is adequate for straightforward mobile app designs.
4. Backend and Database Management
Thunkable:
- Basic Data Handling: Supports simple data management and storage, making it suitable for less complex applications.
- Limited Logic Handling: Offers basic logic for app functionality but may require external services for more complex operations.
Mendix:
- Comprehensive Backend Capabilities: Provides robust backend management, including built-in database capabilities and extensive support for REST and SOAP APIs.
- Complex Logic and Workflows: Enables advanced logic handling and complex business workflows, essential for enterprise applications.
Verdict: Mendix has superior backend capabilities and complex data management, making it suitable for enterprise-level applications, while Thunkable is sufficient for simpler use cases.
5. Integrations and Extensibility
Thunkable:
- API Integration: Supports integration with various third-party services and APIs, allowing users to enhance application functionality.
- Limited Customization: While it allows API integrations, it may not support extensive customization like enterprise solutions.
Mendix:
- Extensive Integration Options: Provides a wide range of connectors for various enterprise systems, including CRM, ERP, and cloud services.
- Microservices Support: Allows for the integration of microservices, enabling modular application development.
Verdict: Mendix offers greater integration capabilities, especially for enterprise applications, while Thunkable is better suited for simpler API integrations.
6. Pricing
Thunkable:
- Free Tier Available: Offers a free plan with limited features, suitable for individuals and educational use.
- Affordable Plans: Provides various pricing tiers, making it accessible for small projects and personal use.
Mendix:
- Enterprise Pricing Model: Generally geared towards larger businesses, with pricing plans reflecting its enterprise-level features and support.
- Free Tier for Small Teams: Offers a free tier for small teams but requires payment for more advanced features.
Verdict: Thunkable is more budget-friendly for individuals and small teams, while Mendix is better suited for larger enterprises that can invest in advanced capabilities.
Final Verdict
- Choose Thunkable if you need a straightforward, user-friendly platform for building simple mobile applications or prototypes. It’s ideal for individual developers, educators, and hobbyists looking to create apps quickly and easily.
- Choose Mendix if you require a powerful platform for developing complex, enterprise-level applications with advanced collaboration features and extensive backend capabilities. It’s perfect for larger organizations focused on optimizing business processes through custom solutions.
In summary, Thunkable is designed for beginners and smaller projects, while Mendix caters to enterprises needing robust application development tools.
Pushing No-Code to Its Limits
Launching an app has never been more cost-effective and time-efficient. Platforms like Bubble.io and Flutter Flow have transformed the development landscape, enabling developers to create sophisticated applications rapidly.
Fast and Cost-Effective Launch
No-code platforms empower startups to launch their apps at lightning speed—often multiple times faster than traditional development—at a fraction of the cost. This agile approach helps startups focus on growth and innovation rather than high upfront development expenses.
Agile Iteration
For early-stage startups, quickly reaching a problem-solution fit is critical. No-code platforms allow rapid adaptation, letting you implement and push new features live in a matter of hours, not weeks. This flexibility means you can stay responsive to market needs and iterate on your product with ease.
Seamless Integration and Plugins
Platforms like Bubble.io and Flutter Flow come with built-in integrations and a wealth of plugins, giving you instant access to essential features and functionalities. Whether you're building a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) or scaling up, these platforms make it easy to connect with tools you need, from payments to analytics.
Version Control Made Simple
Launching new versions of your app has never been easier. No-code platforms provide flexible version control, enabling you to create save points, roll back to previous versions if needed, and experiment confidently
Mayfly Ventures: Leading the No-Code Frontier
While no-code development can have limitations in performance and certain functionalities, Mayfly Ventures, led by CTO Geo George, is pushing past these boundaries. We specialise in building high-performance, highly scalable MVPs with advanced features, deep integrations, and native user experiences that feel polished and professional.
Geo has been at the forefront of low-code development, becoming one of the earliest adopters of Bubble.io in Australia. Over the past six years, he’s honed his expertise in low-code and no-code capabilities, training the Mayfly team to push these platforms to their full potential.
Geo
Startup mentor, product strategist, no-code wiz and PMF expert. Eclectic dance style.
MUCUDU: deep integrations and AI wrapped in low code
Mayfly collaborated with the MUCUDU team to build a low-code MVP for their hospitality tech platform, which includes loyalty management, peer-to-peer monetary gifting, and Tab functionality. Beyond the standard integrations with Stripe, Apple, and Google for login and payments, we incorporated advanced integrations with Point of Sale systems like Doshii and AI-driven recommendations that personalize the dining experience.
With Mayfly Ventures, you get the speed and cost benefits of no-code, combined with the performance and functionality typically reserved for full-stack development.
VOLI Case Study: No-Code in Action
Before working with Mayfly, VOLI’s founder Charlie Crozier had approached 12 different development agencies. As a non-technical founder, Charlie struggled to get his app built and ready for users, with quotes ranging from $300,000 to $1 million. These high costs placed immense pressure on early capital raising.
“When we met Mayfly, both our budget and timeline were completely reevaluated. We were able to go to market at a fraction of the cost and time we had expected—without compromising on quality.”
— Charlie Crozier, Founder
The Process:
Mayfly worked closely with VOLI through a series of workshops to deeply understand the product, its vision, and user needs. Leveraging no-code and low-code frameworks, we built an enterprise-grade app at a fraction of the cost quoted by other studios. Now in pilot testing, VOLI is preparing for release to 10 companies already on the waitlist.
Are you tackling a problem worth solving?
Let's chat opportunity!
No-Code Tools We Love
We use state of the art low code tools and push them to the limit to create performant, scalable, highly functional mobile web apps.
Bubble.io
A powerful no-code platform that lets you build fully functional web applications with drag-and-drop ease. Its flexibility allows you to design, develop, and launch complex apps quickly, without writing a single line of code.
Flutterflow
A platform designed for building mobile apps using Google’s Flutter framework, Flutterflow simplifies the development process while offering extensive customization, making it a go-to tool for responsive, high-performance mobile applications.
Xano
A no-code backend platform that gives you the tools to manage your database, set up APIs, and create scalable back-end solutions, all without the need for server-side programming knowledge.
Are you tackling a problem worth solving?
Let's chat opportunity!
.avif)
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land where we work and live, the Wurundjeri people of the Kulin and pay our respects to Elders past and present.
© Mayfly Ventures 2024
%202.svg)
%201.svg)