Webflow vs Thunkable
Webflow and Thunkable are both popular no-code platforms, but they cater to different areas of development. Webflow is primarily focused on web design and building responsive websites, while Thunkable is aimed at mobile app development, allowing users to create native mobile applications without coding. This comparison explores their key features, target audiences, ease of use, design capabilities, backend management, performance, integrations, and pricing.
.png)
1. Target Audience and Use Cases
Webflow:
- Web Designers and Agencies: Best for users looking to create visually appealing, responsive websites.
- Marketing and Portfolio Sites: Ideal for landing pages, e-commerce sites, and personal portfolios.
Thunkable:
- App Developers and Entrepreneurs: Targeted at users who want to build native mobile applications for iOS and Android.
- Prototype Development: Suitable for quickly prototyping app ideas without coding.
Verdict: Webflow is more suitable for web design projects, while Thunkable is focused on mobile app development.
2. Ease of Use
Webflow:
- Visual Design Interface: Offers a user-friendly interface that allows users to design websites visually, similar to traditional design tools.
- Learning Curve: Requires some time to master advanced features, but basic website creation is straightforward.
Thunkable:
- Drag-and-Drop Interface: Provides an intuitive interface that allows users to build mobile apps using drag-and-drop functionality.
- Learning Curve: Easy for beginners to get started, though more complex app logic may require additional learning.
Verdict: Both platforms are user-friendly, but Thunkable may be easier for those focused on app development, while Webflow is more intuitive for web designers.
3. Design and Customization
Webflow:
- Advanced Design Capabilities: Allows for detailed customization of layout, typography, and animations.
- Responsive Design Tools: Built-in tools to ensure websites look good on all devices.
Thunkable:
- UI Component Library: Offers pre-built components for mobile app design, allowing for rapid development.
- Limited Customization: While users can customize components, it may not offer the same level of flexibility as Webflow.
Verdict: Webflow provides superior design flexibility and customization for websites, whereas Thunkable is focused on functional app design.
4. Backend and Database Management
Webflow:
- Limited Backend Features: Primarily a front-end tool without built-in database capabilities.
- Integrations for Backend: Relies on external services for backend functionalities like forms and e-commerce.
Thunkable:
- Backend Services: Provides built-in options for integrating with databases and external APIs, allowing users to manage data effectively.
- No Code Logic: Users can create data models and backend logic without coding.
Verdict: Thunkable excels in backend management, making it better for apps that require data handling.
5. Performance and Scalability
Webflow:
- Optimized for Websites: Designed for fast loading times and reliable hosting for web projects.
- Scalability: Suitable for small to medium-sized websites, but may face limitations for very large projects.
Thunkable:
- Mobile App Performance: Built to create native mobile applications that perform well on various devices.
- Scalability: Capable of supporting apps that may grow in complexity and user base.
Verdict: Thunkable is more suited for scalable app performance, while Webflow is optimized for web performance.
6. Integrations and Extensibility
Webflow:
- Wide Range of Integrations: Integrates with various tools and services for analytics, marketing, and e-commerce (e.g., Google Analytics, Zapier).
- Limited Custom Code Options: Primarily focuses on front-end design, with fewer options for backend customization.
Thunkable:
- API Integrations: Supports integration with various APIs, allowing for more complex app functionalities.
- Extensibility: Users can create custom logic and workflows to enhance app capabilities.
Verdict: Thunkable offers more extensive integration capabilities for app development, while Webflow excels in integrations for web projects.
7. Pricing
Webflow:
- Affordable Plans: Offers a free plan with limitations and paid plans starting around $12/month for basic features.
- Predictable Pricing: Pricing is straightforward based on website hosting and features.
Thunkable:
- Free Tier: Provides a free plan with access to all features, making it accessible for startups and small teams.
- Paid Plans: Offers premium features and services, with costs based on usage.
Verdict: Thunkable offers a more accessible entry point with its free plan, while Webflow provides competitive pricing for web hosting and design.
Final Verdict
- Choose Webflow if you are a designer or agency focused on creating responsive websites with advanced design capabilities.
- Choose Thunkable if you need to build native mobile applications with backend logic and functionality without writing code.
In summary, Webflow is tailored for web design and customization, making it ideal for marketing and portfolio sites, while Thunkable excels in mobile app development, providing tools for creating feature-rich applications. Your choice should depend on your primary goals: website design or mobile app functionality.
Pushing No-Code to Its Limits
Launching an app has never been more cost-effective and time-efficient. Platforms like Bubble.io and Flutter Flow have transformed the development landscape, enabling developers to create sophisticated applications rapidly.
Fast and Cost-Effective Launch
No-code platforms empower startups to launch their apps at lightning speed—often multiple times faster than traditional development—at a fraction of the cost. This agile approach helps startups focus on growth and innovation rather than high upfront development expenses.
Agile Iteration
For early-stage startups, quickly reaching a problem-solution fit is critical. No-code platforms allow rapid adaptation, letting you implement and push new features live in a matter of hours, not weeks. This flexibility means you can stay responsive to market needs and iterate on your product with ease.
Seamless Integration and Plugins
Platforms like Bubble.io and Flutter Flow come with built-in integrations and a wealth of plugins, giving you instant access to essential features and functionalities. Whether you're building a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) or scaling up, these platforms make it easy to connect with tools you need, from payments to analytics.
Version Control Made Simple
Launching new versions of your app has never been easier. No-code platforms provide flexible version control, enabling you to create save points, roll back to previous versions if needed, and experiment confidently
Mayfly Ventures: Leading the No-Code Frontier
While no-code development can have limitations in performance and certain functionalities, Mayfly Ventures, led by CTO Geo George, is pushing past these boundaries. We specialise in building high-performance, highly scalable MVPs with advanced features, deep integrations, and native user experiences that feel polished and professional.
Geo has been at the forefront of low-code development, becoming one of the earliest adopters of Bubble.io in Australia. Over the past six years, he’s honed his expertise in low-code and no-code capabilities, training the Mayfly team to push these platforms to their full potential.
Geo
Startup mentor, product strategist, no-code wiz and PMF expert. Eclectic dance style.
MUCUDU: deep integrations and AI wrapped in low code
Mayfly collaborated with the MUCUDU team to build a low-code MVP for their hospitality tech platform, which includes loyalty management, peer-to-peer monetary gifting, and Tab functionality. Beyond the standard integrations with Stripe, Apple, and Google for login and payments, we incorporated advanced integrations with Point of Sale systems like Doshii and AI-driven recommendations that personalize the dining experience.
With Mayfly Ventures, you get the speed and cost benefits of no-code, combined with the performance and functionality typically reserved for full-stack development.
VOLI Case Study: No-Code in Action
Before working with Mayfly, VOLI’s founder Charlie Crozier had approached 12 different development agencies. As a non-technical founder, Charlie struggled to get his app built and ready for users, with quotes ranging from $300,000 to $1 million. These high costs placed immense pressure on early capital raising.
“When we met Mayfly, both our budget and timeline were completely reevaluated. We were able to go to market at a fraction of the cost and time we had expected—without compromising on quality.”
— Charlie Crozier, Founder
The Process:
Mayfly worked closely with VOLI through a series of workshops to deeply understand the product, its vision, and user needs. Leveraging no-code and low-code frameworks, we built an enterprise-grade app at a fraction of the cost quoted by other studios. Now in pilot testing, VOLI is preparing for release to 10 companies already on the waitlist.
Are you tackling a problem worth solving?
Let's chat opportunity!
No-Code Tools We Love
We use state of the art low code tools and push them to the limit to create performant, scalable, highly functional mobile web apps.
Bubble.io
A powerful no-code platform that lets you build fully functional web applications with drag-and-drop ease. Its flexibility allows you to design, develop, and launch complex apps quickly, without writing a single line of code.
Flutterflow
A platform designed for building mobile apps using Google’s Flutter framework, Flutterflow simplifies the development process while offering extensive customization, making it a go-to tool for responsive, high-performance mobile applications.
Xano
A no-code backend platform that gives you the tools to manage your database, set up APIs, and create scalable back-end solutions, all without the need for server-side programming knowledge.
Are you tackling a problem worth solving?
Let's chat opportunity!
.avif)
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the land where we work and live, the Wurundjeri people of the Kulin and pay our respects to Elders past and present.
© Mayfly Ventures 2024
%202.svg)
%201.svg)